|
Coursework:
Assignments to Turn In
CLASSMATE
INTERVIEW
| TEACHING PROJECT
| ORAL HISTORY
| CHILD
PROFILE
-
Introduce yourself and
exchange the usual identity information (year in school, major, why
you're here, your future ambitions, etc). Ask each other these questions.
Avoid yes/no questions and ask degree-of-feeling questions. Encourage
reflection.
-
Through questions and follow
up questions, pursue what each of you wrote as your most salient cultural
traits and family values. Talk about how these came to be important
to you, where they were learned, how they've been reinforced. Jot
down direct quotes where possible. Note how your partner's body language,
tone and posture change depending on the subject under discussion.
Note the examples they give, or ask for them.
-
With follow-up questions,
check that you have understood very clearly what was said. Make sure
your quotes are accurate. Exchange contact information with your partner
in case you need to check any problems later.
-
Tonight! Write up your
notes and impressions while the details are still fresh in your mind.
CRITERIA
FOR EVALUATING WRITTEN INTERVIEWS
-
Interviewee is introduced
in context, with details about their physical appearance, voice, tone,
manner and attitude.
-
Statements about this
person's culture and experiences are supported with examples and/or
details. The interviewer elaborates on these ideas, contrasting or
comparing them to his/her own experiences.
-
A clear image emerges of
this person and his/her principle cultural traits and values, supported
by direct quotes and contextual details, if appropriate.
-
The interview is written
up without distracting errors in spelling, syntax, slang or incorrect
usage.
-
The interview is typed
up in no more than three pages, in 12 font, Times New Roman, double-spaced.
It has been spell- and grammar-checked, and the writing "flows"
naturally if read aloud.
CLASSMATE
INTERVIEW RUBRIC
4-5 Includes detailed description
of interviewee and the interview format, information about their culture
and experiences with examples and a comparison to your own. Principle
cultural traits and values are supported with details and quotes. Written
report has no distracting errors in spelling, syntax, incorrect usage
or punctuation.
2-3 Some sections are missing
or incomplete or writing errors distract from comprehension.
0-1 Interview fails to comprehensively
meet the criteria for the assignment and doesn't communicate effectively.
Between now and the end of
the 9th week of class, you will be preparing a lesson to share with children
at the Club. You’ll write up your subject and a step-by-step plan
detailing:
a. The purpose or learning
objectives of the lesson (brief description)
b. The linguistic development objectives of the lesson
c. The intelligences addressed in the lesson
d. The materials and time it will require
e. The step-by-step directions you'll give the children, how you'll
check their understanding (maybe a picture or poster to help if the
steps are complicated).
f. Summary-evaluation, including children’s observations, quotes
When this is ready, you’ll
assemble the materials and try it out. Try to hang on to examples of student
work, photos, etc., for sharing with the class. This is going
to be FUN! By being there, you enrich the children’s lives
through sharing one of your special interests or talents with them. You’ll
leave them with something concrete and at the same time try your hand
at teaching.
Choosing your subject: Sadly,
there can be no food- nor glitter-based projects this year. What else
could you do that these children might learn? Play a sport, make a craft
or draw in a particular way? Learn some phrases in another language? Use
chopsticks? Brainstorm with your classmates.
Lesson organization: Plan to
spend approximately an hour doing the project with them. List the materials
you’ll need (and we’ll talk about what the Club has on hand).
Outline the steps your project will take. Plan your motivation techniques
(and any rewards you’ll offer). Practice talking through the steps
in scripted stages to help the children develop the internal dialog they’ll
need to achieve mastery. Organize your materials (maybe even create a
flyer). Make a sample or two, if you have an art project you’re
doing. Plan how you will display or celebrate what you’ve accomplished.
RUBRIC FOR
TEACHING PROJECTS
The teaching projects will
be scheduled in class. The week following your presentation at the Club,
you will do a 5-minute review for the class. The write-up of your lesson
is due at that time, as well.
For assessing the WRITTEN projects,
the following descriptors guide evaluation.
16-20 points: Teaching project has all of suggested sections
and is well organized for the reader’s clear understanding. Visuals,
samples of student work and/or photos illustrate the text. The evaluation
provided is comprehensive, tying student motivation, teaching strategies,
student engagement, learning stages and outcomes with thoughtful discussion
that reflects the subjects and objectives of the course.
11-15 points: The project has most of the sections and
is comprehensible, but there are few illustrations or efforts beyond the
basic requirements and/or few samples of student work. Work is somewhat
disorganized or appears rushed. The evaluation part of the report lacks
evidence of serious reflection and has few connections established to
the readings and course discussions.
0-10 points: The project seems hastily assembled and
is lacking many parts of the assignment. It is difficult to follow what
went on, there are few descriptions of the work involved, writing has
many errors. The evaluation makes few connections to class content and
seems cursory and/or superficial.
The ORAL presentation will
be evaluated according to the following criteria.
4-5 points: Speaker has a bright, enthusiastic tone,
good eye contact, and can be heard easily. The presentation is well supported
with visual evidence, organized point by point for easy comprehension,
and very informative.
2-3 points: Speaker has some trouble with voice and/or
eye contact, is somewhat difficult to hear or comprehend at times. The
presentation is supported somewhat with visual evidence and/or fairly
clearly organized. The presentation lacks a clear conclusion.
0-1 points: Speaker has voice, diction and/or projection
challenges, is difficult to understand. The presentation shows little
evidence of preparation and thought.
RUBRIC
FOR ON-SITE TEACHING ACTIVITY (10 points)
8-10 points:
Presentation is outstanding. Cyberguide is well organized, prompt, and
carefully prepared with necessary materials, etc. Project introduction
is highly motivational, friendly and engaging. Demonstration models the
project steps, clarifies goals, anticipates and addresses children's questions,
and utilizes samples effectively. Cyberguide leads the children through
the lesson smoothly, introducing each phase with
modeling, talking them through it (helping them verbalize), and
congratulating them on their efforts.
5-7 points: Presentation is complete and well planned
but skimping on some of the affective or scaffolding specifics. Children
have some difficulty understanding lesson objectives or completing the
project or Cyberguide provides insufficient direction and verbal interaction.
2-4 points: Several elements of the presentation are
weak, Cyberguide is insufficiently prepared (unclear on lesson steps,
objectives, etc.). Children have some difficulty understanding tasks.
0-1 points: Insufficient and inadequate project either
plagiarized or done without attention to assignment specifications.
Each family's remembered history
is a collection of stories about past triumphs and tragedies, wins and
losses, challenges and achievements. In the past, when extended families
lived close by, grandparents and other elders could often share their
memories, experiences and values with younger generations. Now, as mobility
and technology continue to change how modern families interact, there
are fewer opportunities for their knowledge to be passed to the young,
and family stories and traditions are often lost. This assignment will
provide you with a valuable experience developing a mini case study or
ethnographic inquiry. At the same time it will encourage you to seek out
an elder “knowledge holder” in your family or the community and follow
these steps.
-
Identify an elder from
your family or a close family to interview, choosing someone you have
always wanted to talk with, who has an interesting story to tell.
-
Conduct a web search for
background information on their place of origin and the historical
events they experienced, then construct a list of general questions
you will be asking during your interview. Questions should direct
your interviewee toward remembrances of growing up, family life, schooling,
leisure activities, youthful expectations for the future, as well
as significant events such as first employment, marriage, births and
deaths. You’ll need to keep the themes of the class in mind,
also (discrimination, education, socioeconomic opportunity, language
barriers, cultural conflicts, etc.). If your interviewee wants to
talk about some event which had great importance in his/her life,
you will want to ask about their recollections of the event, what
they remember thinking and feeling at the time, how they saw other
people respond, and how they now view the event. Be prepared to let
the interviewee follow his or her narrative, and to drop questions
you had prepared which don’t “fit” with the direction
of their recollections. (See part E, below).
-
Set a time and place for
the interview that will be quiet and comfortable for both of you and
free from interruptions. Plan to spend at least an hour talking with
your interviewee, but be flexible. You may want to schedule a follow-up
interview after you have reviewed your notes.
-
With your interviewee's
permission, you may choose to audiotape, videotape, and/or take notes
during the interview. Tape transcriptions are time-consuming but they
yield the specific quotations that allow your interviewee to speak
through your paper. Word-for-word transcriptions are not required,
however, simple summary will suffice. We encourage you to take a photo
of your interviewee, or the two of you together, to personalize your
document. Be sure to explain that this interview will be used only
in an educational context and not become public information but find
out if your interviewee would mind if their story became part of a
book about UCI students' heritage. If they don't mind, get their signature
on the permission form, please.
-
When you have completed
the interview and prepared your transcription / summation, prepare
a 9-12 page paper, of which 4-5 pages are analysis of what you learned
from your interview. Incorporate into your analysis at least four
of the major themes from this class.
-
Cultural Diversity
and Multicultural Education
-
Cultural Differences
and Commonalities (Individualism v. Collectivism)
-
Diversity, Pluralism
and Prejudice
-
The Debate over “English-Only”
Instruction v. Bilingual Education
-
Identity and Personal
Development (particularly in-school experiences)
-
Discrimination in Linguistic
and/or Educational Settings
-
Equality or Inequality
of Opportunity
-
Mentoring Relationships
and Support Networks
Each final paper should contain
the following parts.
Historical Context
A paragraph or two on the historical and social context of your subject’s
group. Information you find in academic and/or Internet research will
help you establish the social and historical context affecting your subject
(place, time, major events, push factors for immigration, etc.). Be sure
you have properly utilized quotation marks and attributed your information
to its sources in complete footnotes or bibliography references.
Biographical Profile
The story of how your interview subject came to be where he or she is
now. This section describes how you met this person and why you chose
to interview him or her. This profile might already establish the major
events that shaped this individual and the themes you will highlight from
your interview notes.
Interview Highlights
or Excerpts (with quotations, where possible) This section introduces
the interviewee and any main themes you believe will help the reader understand
him or her. Precise quotes allow the interviewee to speak directly to
the reader and greatly enrich this section. You may decide to organize
the excerpts you select by themes as the information suggests them. Select
important quotations from your interview to quote directly, Your own commentary
introduces their words, adds descriptions, or summarizes what you found
significant in their statements.
Conclusion and Evaluation
Discuss what you learned from this person’s life and what they shared
with you. Discuss how you have been affected by this project, how your
perceptions may have changed, and any further questions that occur to
you. Also note here what you found most interesting or most challenging
in the oral history/life history process, and what changes you might incorporate
in a future effort.
Format Submit
this project typed or word-processed, double-spaced, 12 font with normal
margins.
Due date for
the completed Oral History Assignment is Wednesday, December 1, 2004.
ORAL
HISTORY RUBRIC
There are 20 points possible
and your grade will constitute 20% of your course grade.
HISTORICAL CONTEXT
(4 points)
Maximum points:
Clearly describes historical antecedents and factors affecting this individual;
describes social factors (socio-economic status, immigration, etc.); details
enrich understanding; 1-2 paragraphs include place, time, major events,
push factors, etc.
Minimum points:
Few or incomplete descriptions of historical and social context; little
or no detail.
BIOGRAPHICAL PROFILE
(4 points)
Maximum points:
Narrative includes description of why you chose this individual, the context
in which you conducted the interview, how the interview proceeded, how
your subject came to be where he/she is now, and the major events that
shaped this individual and how they relate to the topic focuses or principal
themes of the interview.
Minimum points:
Notes where and when the subject was interviewed with little explanation
of why you chose this individual and what you thought would be interesting
to learn from him/her. Includes lttle detail of how the interview proceeded.
INTERVIEW EXCERPTS
(6 points)
Maximum points: Thorough
description of the interviewee, including details such as their gender,
age, physical appearance, immigration status, cultural and social attributes,
languages, profession, education, family status, and socio-economic status.
These subjects are tied, where possible, to class themes and to the major
focuses of the interview. Individual is directly quoted frequently, with
your commentary as explanation or elaboration. You may include physical
changes you observed when your subject talked about certain themes. You
may include written transcripts of the interview questions and responses
themselves.
Minimum points:
Inadequate description of the individual, leaving out many of the interviewee’s
essential characteristics. Pays little attention to the themes of the
course. Few direct quotes used – subject described rather than permitted
to speak in his/her own voice. It is difficult to separate the subject’s
voice from yours. Little or no description of the nonverbal aspects or
progress of the interview included. Little or no clear themes or major
focuses highlighted.
CONCLUSION AND EVALUATION
(6 points)
Maximum points:
Thoroughly discusses what you learned from this person’s life, referring
back to specific themes and quotations. Describes how it affected you,
making connections to your own life, where possible. Includes any questions
you were left with after the interview. Describes what you found most
challenging or interesting about the oral history process and what you
might do differently in a subsequent similar project.
Minimum points:
Provides only a brief description of what you learned from this individual,
from his/her life, and from the interview process.
This week your assignment is
to write a profile or mini-case study of one of your children. Be sure
you have asked them in previous weeks about everything you need to know
(although you certainly won't be expected to write about every thing in
the lists below). Find out about the child, and confirm your perceptions
from past time spent with him or her, from genuine interest and enjoyment
of them (like Kozol) and, of course, do so in a way that is non-threatening
and supportive. This is a class assignment (make a hardcopy for class)
as well as a field note question and for which you will receive two grades.
Naturally you can't be certain about your perceptions - you're only getting
a small glimpse of these young children in this limited context - but
your feelings and inferences about them are still helpful descriptions
and often are very insightful.
8-10 points:
The profile...
- is carefully written and
shows serious reflection on this child's life and academic potential.
- reflects obvious affection
and respect for the child as an individual.
- describes the child's appearance
and physical characteristics relative to other children (tall for his
age, seems fussy about his hair, etc.)
- effectively places the
child in context, describing the child's role in his/her..
- family (birth order,
responsibilities at home, role expectations)
- community (extracurricular
activities, interests, hobbies, affiliations)
- school (grade level,
favorite subjects, attitude toward teachers, placement labels, rank,
responsibilities as a student, attitude toward testing, risk-taking
and failure, favorite learning activities, understanding of academic
options and future paths in school, etc).
- identifies child's self-concepts
and beliefs such as their sense of competency (words used to describe
themselves or you'd use to describe them) and attitudes toward friends,
adults, and/or you).
- provides direct quotations
and detailed, rich descriptions of shared activities, where the child
"comes alive" for the reader (significant anecdotes, facial
expressions, reactions to events).
- may have titles or highlighted
and repeated descriptors that capture the child's essence.
5-7 points: The profile may...
- be thoughtfully written
but somewhat superficial.
- be unclear in presenting
perceptions about or relationship with the child.
- provide an incomplete physical
description.
- neglect to fully develop
the child's role in his/her family, community or school.
- be very limited in conveying
anything about how the child thinks, what they value and believe about
him or her self.
- have few, no or irrelevant
quotations.
- lack clear descriptions
and anecdotes that support profile's contentions.
|